Lab

Entanglement — Bell / CHSH

Two DANodes share one phase; measuring one side instantly reflects on the other.

Read full derivation
SPT Model

Two DANodes share one membrane patch — their phase φ₁₂ is fixed (locked), not two separate phases. Measurement on either side collapses the SAME phase; the other side reflects this instantly because there was never anything to send.

Singlet state (Bell pair)
Two nodes locked in opposite-polarity superposition. SPT: one shared phase, two anchor cells.
Quantum correlation
Expectation of joint spin measurement when detectors are at angles θ_A, θ_B.
CHSH inequality (classical bound)
Any local-realist theory must obey |S| ≤ 2. Quantum mechanics violates this.
Tsirelson bound (quantum max)
Reached at a=0, a'=π/2, b=π/4, b'=3π/4. SPT recovers this exactly.
No-signalling (causality)
Marginal probability on A is independent of B's measurement choice — no FTL communication.
Live Derivation
Bell inequality VIOLATED — quantum non-locality
Physics Recovery
CHSH violation (Tsirelson bound)
Aspect 1982; CHSH 1969
PASS
Predicted (SPT)
2.828
Measured
2.828
Δ = 0.0000%
Bell-inequality violation (>2)
Bell 1964 (violation = quantum non-locality)
PASS
Predicted (SPT)
2.828
Measured
2.690
Δ = 5.15%
Singlet correlation E = -cos(Δθ)
QM textbook; verified to <0.1% in all Bell tests
PASS
Predicted (SPT)
-0.7071
Measured
-0.7071
Δ = 0.0000%
Soundness
Entanglement controls
θ_A — detector A angle
θ_B — detector B angle45°