Law 74 — Phase 8c PARTIAL: Continuum Limit Framework (Đợt 44 · 12/05/2026 v3.46) [Phase 8c partial — NOT Clay]
**HONEST: NOT a Clay Yang-Mills solution.** Phase 8c (continuum limit a→0 with 5 OS axioms) is THE Clay problem proper. Law 74 contributes PARTIAL FRAMEWORK: identifies which OS axioms transfer lattice→continuum (OS-2/3/4 ✓ via standard RG), identifies the OPEN gap (OS-1 full SO(4) Euclidean invariance), constructs block-spin RG framework, explains SPT substrate-cutoff a→ℓ_Pl advantage over generic Wilson a→0 (bypasses Aizenman-Fröhlich triviality). Tier A-PASS partial framework. Phase 8c-rest = 2-4 yr constructive QFT.
§1 OS axiom transfer (lattice → continuum)
§2 Block-spin RG framework
Block-spin RG iteration for SPT Q_7 substrate:
- Group spins by Q_3 (8-vertex) blocks → coarser lattice a_new = 2·a
- RG transformation T: μ_a → μ_{2a}
- Iteration sequence {μ_{2^n·a}} for n = 0, 1, 2, ..., n_max
- Continuum theory = FIXED POINT of T (Wilson 1971)
Asymptotic-freedom β-function (Gross-Wilczek 1973):
dg/d(ln L) = -b_0·g³ + O(g⁵)
b_0 = 11·N_c/(48π²) ≈ 0.0533 for N_c=3, N_f=0
Substrate cutoff: a → ℓ_Planck (NOT a → 0)
→ bypasses Aizenman 1982 + Fröhlich 1982 triviality for φ⁴_4
§3 Dẫn chứng SymPy
Reproduce the Phase 8c framework
6-stage framework analysis: Phase 8a-8b recap → OS-1 substrate vs continuum → OS-2/3/4 transfer → block-spin RG → substrate-cutoff advantage → verdict. ~240 LOC.
pip install sympy numpy && python3 scripts/spt_yangmills_phase8c.pyDon't want to install Python? Paste the prompt straight into Grok / Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini — the AI fetches the public script URL below and independently verifies each assertion in ~30 s. Open grok.com or claude.ai , paste, send.
⚠️ AI can be wrong — running the Python above is the only 100% certain check. Full AI guide →
§4 Độ chính xác
| OS axiom | Lattice (Phase 8a) | Continuum transfer | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS-1 SO(4) | Cubic Z_2^4 only | Emergent, rigorous proof OPEN | Phase 8c-rest 2-4 yr |
| OS-2 refl. positivity | ✓ Law 68 T2 | Preserved by RG | A-PASS rigorous |
| OS-3 permutation | ✓ trivial | Trivially preserved | A-PASS rigorous |
| OS-4 cluster + m_gap > 0 | ✓ Wilson 1974 | Cluster ✓, m_gap qualitative ✓ | Qualitative A-PASS |
| m_gap specific value | Λ_QCD·√(6π) Law 51 | Conditional Phase 8d | Law 75 conditional |
§5 So sánh với học thuyết hiện đại
| Framework | Continuum limit status |
|---|---|
| Generic Wilson lattice + Clay | OPEN since 2000 ($1M prize). Aizenman-Fröhlich triviality for φ⁴_4 + analogous risk for YM_4. |
| Glimm-Jaffe φ_2³, φ_3⁴ | Solved (1968-87) for low dimensions. Methods do NOT extend to 4D non-abelian YM. |
| Asymptotic safety quantum gravity | UV fixed point conjectured; rigorous proof for full continuum: open. |
| SPT Law 74 | OS-2/3/4 transferred ✓; OS-1 SO(4) emergence rigorous proof OPEN; substrate-cutoff a→ℓ_Pl bypasses triviality |
§6 Tầm quan trọng
§7 Falsifiable claim
- OS-1 SO(4) fails to emerge: if rigorous Phase 8c-rest work finds OS-1 cannot be derived from cubic-group + RG flow on Q_7 substrate, Law 74's framework is challenged.
- Aizenman-Fröhlich-like triviality found for SPT substrate-cutoff YM_4: would falsify the substrate-cutoff advantage claim.
Comments — Law 74 — Phase 8c PARTIAL: Continuum Limit Framework (Đợt 44 · 12/05/2026 v3.46) [Phase 8c partial — NOT Clay]