Direction 2b — Closing the open RG gaps (β, α-flow, continuum frame)
Advances the three items left open in lattice RG: (1) b1,b2,b3 as Bagua rationals; (2) 1-loop α1,α2 flow over t_*=32 toward IR 137 spine; (3) substrate a=ℓ_Pl vs continuum a→0 separation. Easy language + glossary. Script: spt_rg_action_beta_alpha.py.
§0 Terms (→ glossary)
| Term | Plain meaning | Link |
|---|---|---|
| b₁, b₂, b₃ | One-loop β coefficients for U(1), SU(2), SU(3) | glossary |
| 1-loop flow | 1/α_i(low) = 1/α_i(high) + (b_i/2π)·t | RG |
| 137 spine | Combinatorial IR 1/α = Q₇+Q₃+1 — not replaced by flow | 137 |
| L_sub vs L_cont | Fixed-a substrate RG vs a→0 continuum Clay limit | μ_UV |
| δ_RG | Primary θ_W shift 1/(1024π) from Direction 2 | δ_RG |
§1 Picture: three open doors
Direction 2 built the zoom pipe (hop → window t_=32 → δ_RG). Three questions remained: (1) What are the zoom speeds b_i? (2) Can α itself flow toward 137? (3) Is this the same as continuum Clay RG?* This page answers with forms + flow + a hard separation — not marketing.
§2 OPEN-1 — b₁, b₂, b₃ as Bagua rationals
The textbook SM one-loop coefficients are exactly writable from Q₃ alone (plus fixed 6 and 10):
b1 = (5*Q3 + 1)/10 # 41/10
b2 = -(2*Q3 + 3)/6 # -19/6
b3 = -(Q3 - 1) # -7Meaning. We no longer “import mysterious decimals.” We state: these β-spines are Bagua integers. Remaining: derive why the prefactors 10 and 6 from a path integral on S (still research).
§3 OPEN-2 — α₁, α₂ flow over t_*=32
- Boundary: sin²θ_W=3/13 (Direction 1) + UV seed 1/α_em = Q₇ = 128.
- Flow: 1/α_i(low) = 1/α_i(high) + (b_i/2π)·t_* with Bagua b_i.
- Reconstruct 1/α_em(low) = (5/3)/α₁ + 1/α₂ (Tier-A band vs PDG M_Z).
- Combinatorial 137 spine remains exact — dynamical flow sits nearby; spine not replaced.
§4 OPEN-3 — Substrate RG ≠ continuum Clay
L_sub: a = ℓ_Pl fixed, V→∞, μ_UV = 2J/ℏ (a cancels). L_cont: a→0 on ℝ⁴ (Clay). Direction 2+2b live in L_sub. Equivalence map E: L_sub ↔ L_cont remains open — same honesty as the Clay wiki retraction. Closing substrate RG does not win the Millennium prize by itself.
§5 SymPy
Open-gap closure script
pip install sympy numpy && python3 scripts/spt_rg_action_beta_alpha.py && python3 scripts/spt_rg_lattice_flow.pyDon't want to install Python? Paste the prompt straight into Grok / Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini — the AI fetches the public script URL below and independently verifies each assertion in ~30 s. Open grok.com or claude.ai , paste, send.
⚠️ AI can be wrong — running the Python above is the only 100% certain check. Full AI guide →
§6 Practical meaning
- Research: β coefficients are no longer foreign SM decimals — they are Q₃ rationals you can audit.
- Honesty: know which channel predicts θ_W (δ_RG) vs which only bookkeeps α flow.
- Clay boundary: do not claim continuum prize from substrate RG papers.
- Not hardware. Still no engine/battery from β-functions.
§7 Still open after 2b
- Path-integral why for b_i prefactors (10, 6, …).
- Sub-percent absolute 1/α_em(M_Z) from first principles alone.
- Equivalence E: substrate ↔ classical continuum (Clay).
Comments — Direction 2b — Closing the open RG gaps (β, α-flow, continuum frame)